Tuesday 27 May 2014

Is That Person Really a Bigot?

Why we should be cautious with our use of the word "bigot".

Opposing gay marriage doesn't usually equal hating gay people.
The inspiration to write this post came from the Pink News piece of 27 May entitled, "Tory blogger Tim Montgomerie: 'I support gay marriage but most traditionalists are not homophobes.' " The Pink News article seems to be based on Tim Montgomerie's piece on Conservative Home: "The Ten Creators of Ukip."

It seems to me that there is a problem of language where the word "bigot" is concerned. At the moment, the word is applied to a very wide range of people. I often see the word being used in LGBT media comments pages as an unchallenged description of everyone who does not support same-sex marriage, with or without the prefix "hateful".

At one end of the spectrum, there is the real hateful homophobe, who would like homosexuality to be a criminal offence and LGBT people to be ridiculed, victimised and excluded. Some such people (particularly in fundamentalist Islamic states) think we should be executed.
At the other end of the spectrum is the person who harbours no hatred or dislike towards LGBT people, is outraged by homophobic discrimination when he or she perceives it, and supports an equal age of consent, job protection from discrimination, and a whole raft of equality measures, but because of a specific (usually religious) belief about the word "marriage" needing to be restricted to heterosexual relationships, finds himself or herself unable to support equal marriage.
The word "bigot" is a pretty blunt instrument to apply to both these people. To put them into the same category surely trivialises the evil of the former, by implying he or she is no worse than simply being in the same category as the latter.

We are all human. Let's listen to one another.
Where bigotry is concerned, I think it is best to look at evidence for what is going on in people's hearts. If they are wilfully ignorant and wedded to their hatred and disdain of LGBT people, then they are bigots. If they are generally good people who show good will towards LGBT people, but have a misguided belief here and there, then they are just misguided, and hopefully we can gently persuade them of their error, or agree to disagree given that we are otherwise very much on the same page.
I write this as someone who strongly supports equal marriage, and who has spent a lot of time arguing and campaigning for it.
What concerns me is black-and-white, entrenched thinking, from whatever side of the debate. Where LGBT people are concerned, most of us have experienced a great deal of suffering as a result of discrimination and prejudice. It can be very easy for that suffering and a response of anger to be triggered. Extreme language should in my view be reserved for those who really deserve it: otherwise the power of the language we have to describe evil people and evil deeds becomes diluted by too wide an application.

One thing I have learned in the course of my life is the importance of trying not to write people off, to damn them into a permanent and perpetual ossification of badness because of a view they hold that I do not like and do not agree with. In the case of some individuals, it is quite a challenge to live according to that maxim. In the case of others, it has become less of a challenge. 

There is a place for forgiveness and generosity in disagreement.
No-one forms their views in some kind of vacuum: life experiences and one's inherited disposition have a great influence on what we come to believe. We all harbour mistaken views at some points in our lives that may cause hurt to others when expressed or acted upon. I suppose that making room for such errors, in the hope that today's adversary may be tomorrow's ally, falls within the domain of what we mean by forgiveness. If we can only show very little forgiveness to others, we will only find very little forgiveness for ourselves, and that is a formula for suffering all round. 

Maybe the parable of The Good Samaritan is a good metaphor for how the person with whom we disagree may be the very person who would offer a helping hand during a time of crisis and adversity. That must surely be worth something.

© Gary Powell, 2014